TOM INGRAM & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Case Studies, Newsletters, "How To" Tools, Success Stories Client Comments on Results Provided Articles, Books Tom Ingram and Associates Home Improving Sales for Retail Merchandising Organizations

 

Success Stories by Our Associates

 

Overview:

 

Generated Approximately $21 Million in Additional Sales for Manufacturer, Best out of 36 Teams at New Item Speed to Shelf, Three Years in A Row*:  For three years in a row, Associate's team conducted a total of 12 new item launches and finished first among 36 teams all three years.  Approximately $21 million in additional sales were attributable to Associate's team.  Sales increase was due to effectiveness of Associate's team at getting new items on shelves, highlighted by 100% attendance of Associate's people at every launch for three years in a row.

 

    Problems / Challenges Faced:

  •         Merchandising organizations are usually treated like a "vendor" rather than a "partner"

  •         Usually, merchandising companies do not find out about new item launches until it is too late to effectively plan, partner and manage all the details of an effective new item launch

  •         Manufacturers will often complain (loudly) about the merchandising work done by broker organizations, but will not switch to using a 3rd party merchandising company because the broker is essential to headquarter selling, promotions and new item launches.

 

     Solution:

  • Associate had worked for a large broker with a merchandising organization, so knew its strengths and weaknesses

  • Key was insisting on being treated as a PARTNER

  • Associate knew that Broker's people had the same problems of being treated like "vendors", not told about new item launches until too late, etc.

  • Manufacturer was willing to measure both outside merchandising teams and the manufacturer's personnel on the same measurement system.  All involved had incentives to get new items on 85% of shelves in their territories within 8 weeks, as measured by IRI or Nielson.

  • Associate insisted on a standard meeting schedule with the manufacturer which had to be kept.  These were 1/2 day meetings of all concerned at 12 weeks prior to first shipment, 8 weeks prior to first shipment, and 4 weeks prior to first shipment.

  • Associate was aware that manufacturer's personnel would not want to allocate this much time, but he insisted on this as a condition of taking the assignment.

  • Associate notes that "Execution is a given.  All competitors can execute.  How well you manage the communication process with the manufacturer, retailer and merchandising field organization is the key."

Results:

  • Associate's team was #1 team in country out of 36 teams, three years in a row

  • Associate's team got new items on 85% of shelves in their territory within 8 weeks, for 12 launches, three years in a row. 

  • Manufacturer’s sales in 2006 were approximately $1.5 billion, which was an 11% increase over 2005.  Associate's territory was responsible for 39% of manufacturer’s sales in U.S..  The sales increase in  Associate's territory would be $1.5 billion * 11% * 39% = approximately $64 million.  Associate believes it is reasonable to attribute about 1/3 of this increase to the efforts of his team, for a total of approximately $21 million in incremental sales directly attributable to Associate's team.